Re: Problem substituting /proc/mounts for recovery

On Friday 07 April 2006 12:24, Ph. Marek wrote:
> During recovery I'm running off a chroot (booted via knoppix);
> I'm trying to fake a mount table, so that the output of mount
> and df can be correctly parsed by the boot loader installation
> (in the chroot the "df -k /boot" returns no device).
....

Did I do something wrong, or is this just a warnock?


Any reactions, please?
Thank you.


Regards,

Phil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Problem substituting /proc/mounts for recovery
    • From: "Ph. Marek" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] x86_64 sparsemem does not need node_mem_map
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] uts namespaces: Switch to using uts namespaces
• Previous by thread: Problem substituting /proc/mounts for recovery
• Next by thread: kernel socket select issue
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]