What is the most efficient way to copy a bunch of files nowadays?

After having read-only mucked with the headers of a bunch of files[1]
I've selected a subset of 2500 or so with sizes going from 2K to 85M
which I want to copy to another directory in the same local
filesystem.  What is the "best" (CPU usage, fragmentation, wall clock
time, system responsiveness during and after the copy) way to copy
these files?  read+write, mmap+write, read+mmap, mmap+mmap+memcpy,
something else?  That's with recent kernels, of course.

  OG.

[1] Say rpms from a random distribution and its updates for instance
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What is the most efficient way to copy a bunch of files nowadays?
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: i386 - msr support for xen
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] vfs: add splice_write and splice_read to documentation
• Previous by thread: i386 - msr support for xen
• Next by thread: Re: What is the most efficient way to copy a bunch of files nowadays?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]