Re: [2.6 patch] move EXPORT_SYMBOL's away from sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c

At Mon, 10 Apr 2006 18:21:54 +0200,
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> 
> > I know the above for the new codes, yes.  But my question is wheter do
> > we get a good enough benifit by changing the existing code.
> > 
> > I'm not against such an action but just wornder whether it's really
> > needed.  If yes, we should do it over the whole tree.
> > 
> 
> that's what Adrian is doing, one subsystem at a time ;)
> it was just your turn...

OK, then I'll check over the subtree, too.


thanks,

Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [2.6 patch] move EXPORT_SYMBOL's away from sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] move EXPORT_SYMBOL's away from sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c
  - From: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] move EXPORT_SYMBOL's away from sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c
  - From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] move EXPORT_SYMBOL's away from sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c
  - From: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
- Re: [2.6 patch] move EXPORT_SYMBOL's away from sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/6] Have Power use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes()
Next by Date: [PATCH 3/6] Have x86 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes
Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] move EXPORT_SYMBOL's away from sound/pci/emu10k1/emu10k1_main.c
Next by thread: [2.6 patch] let X86_VOYAGER depend on SMP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]