Re: [PATCH 3/3] deinline a few large functions in vlan code - v3

From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 11:11:12 +0300

> Ok, one last try. Would you like this smallish patch instead?
> It takes care of those BIG inlines.

You're putting vlan stuff into a net/core/*.c file, that
is not correct.

If we're not going to do the ifdef mess, fudging around it
by putting a "VLAN" function into generic networking core
code isn't the way to try and deal with it.

Like I said, let's just leave things they way they are.
Every suggestion shown so far has been worse than what we
have now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 3/3] deinline a few large functions in vlan code - v3
    • From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 3/3] deinline a few large functions in vlan code - v3
    • From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 3/3] deinline a few large functions in vlan code - v3
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 3/3] deinline a few large functions in vlan code - v3
    • From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: OOM kills if swappiness set to 0, swap storms otherwise
• Next by Date: Re: GPL issues
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/3] deinline a few large functions in vlan code - v3
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/3] deinline a few large functions in vlan code - v3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]