Re: [PATCH] de_thread: Don't confuse users do_each_thread.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Oeser <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>
> On Tuesday, 11. April 2006 01:16, you wrote:
>> I can't seem to send out a correct patch out today with out
>> sending it twice.  I accidently grabbed my old version
>> that sent to many arguments to detach_pid and so would not
>> compile.  Oops.
>
> While you are at it: Could you please avoid calculating current over 
> and over again? 
>
> Just calculate it once and use the task_struct pointer.
>
> If I do this for some random occurances of "current" in fs/exec.c I get this
> on Linus' latest git tree:
>
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>    9501      84      12    9597    257d old/fs/exec.o
>    9386      84      12    9482    250a new/fs/exec.o
>
> Do you see any side effects, except reduced size 
> and increased performance here?

Not that I know of.  I was cleaning up pids and signaling and wound
up in fixing de_thread.  It is just an ugly beast.

> Is a patch doing this for the whole file welcome, if you are too busy?

I could probably spare a couple of minutes to help review such a patch.
Beyond de_thread I'm to busy to write such a patch.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux