On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:07:32AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Monday 10 April 2006 06:01, you wrote:
> > Since the driver already sets the correct dma_mask, there is no reason
> > to bail there. In fact if you have an iommu, I think you can have a
> > address above 1G which will be ok for the device (if it isn't true then
> > the powerpc dma_alloc_coherent with iommu needs to be fixed because it
> > doesn't respect the the dma_mask).
> >
> > Please comment or apply.
>
> NACK. Don't apply that patch.
> I know it is odd, but people are actually hitting these messages.
> Maybe benh can explain the issues. I don't know...
>
Yes, I know they hit the message, that's from a message in some forum
that i got interested in the issue. It probably comes from an allocation
from:
http://www.linux-m32r.org/lxr/http/source/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_direct_iommu.c#L32
Either the ppc code is wrong (it doesn't enforce dma_mask) either the
driver still works without the check.
Maybe ppc should do the same thing as i386:
47 if (dev == NULL || (dev->coherent_dma_mask < 0xffffffff))
48 gfp |= GFP_DMA;
thanks,
Benoit
--
powered by bash/screen/(urxvt/fvwm|linux-console)/gentoo/gnu/linux OS
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
