Re: [PATCH 5/19] kconfig: improve config load/save output

Hi,

On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> > > sym_change_count is only used as a flag, not as a counter.
> > 
> > It was intended as a counter, even it's currently only tested againsted 
> > zero.
> That I figured out myself. But the intention should not be reflected
> years after when the intention did not hold.

There is not much point in changing it right now and it doesn't really 
matter for this patch.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 5/19] kconfig: improve config load/save output
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 5/19] kconfig: improve config load/save output
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 5/19] kconfig: improve config load/save output
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 5/19] kconfig: improve config load/save output
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/19] kconfig: improve config load/save output
• Next by Date: [GIT PULL] post-2.6.17-rc1 fixes
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 5/19] kconfig: improve config load/save output
• Next by thread: [PATCH 7/19] kconfig: remove SYMBOL_{YES,MOD,NO}
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]