Dan Dennedy wrote:Also, I have not released a version of libraw1394 that contains the deprecation warnings, but I can do so this weekend. And then another release when the removed kernel interfaces are released that removes the functions.
We should have added such warnings already to the kernel at the moment when the two ioctls went into feature-removal-schedule.txt.
-- Stefan Richter -=====-=-==- -=-- -=--- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the overdue removal of RAW1394_REQ_ISO_{LISTEN,SEND}
- From: Jody McIntyre <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the overdue removal of RAW1394_REQ_ISO_{LISTEN,SEND}
- References:
- [RFC: 2.6 patch] the overdue removal of RAW1394_REQ_ISO_{LISTEN,SEND}
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the overdue removal of RAW1394_REQ_ISO_{LISTEN,SEND}
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the overdue removal of RAW1394_REQ_ISO_{LISTEN,SEND}
- From: Dan Dennedy <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the overdue removal of RAW1394_REQ_ISO_{LISTEN,SEND}
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- [RFC: 2.6 patch] the overdue removal of RAW1394_REQ_ISO_{LISTEN,SEND}
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the overdue removal of RAW1394_REQ_ISO_{LISTEN,SEND}
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Script for automated historical Git tree grafting
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the overdue removal of RAW1394_REQ_ISO_{LISTEN,SEND}
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the overdue removal of RAW1394_REQ_ISO_{LISTEN,SEND}
- Index(es):
 |