I'll be filing a FC5 performance bug for this but would like an opinion
from the IDE kernel people just in case this has already been seen...
I just upgraded my home K7-800, 512MB RAM box from FC3 to FC5
and noticed a disk performance slowdown while copying files around.
System has two 160GB disks, a Samsung SP1604N 2MB cache and
a Maxtor 6Y160P0 8MB cache; both disks appear to be almost 2x
slower both on hdparm -t tests (17-19MB/s against 33/35 MB/s) and
on dd tests, like this:
FC3
[root@donkey tmp]# time dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null skip=200 bs=1024k count=200
200+0 records in
200+0 records out
real 0m4.623s
user 0m0.004s
sys 0m1.308s
FC5
[root@donkey tmp]# time dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null skip=200 bs=1024k count=200
200+0 records in
200+0 records out
209715200 bytes (210 MB) copied, 9.67808 seconds, 21.7 MB/s
real 0m9.683s
user 0m0.008s
sys 0m1.400s
The initial tests were my last FC3 self-compiled kernel (2.6.16-rc5-git8)
vs FC5's 2.6.16-1.2080_FC5 kernel; so just to be sure, I copied over
from my FC3 partition the 2.6.16-rc5-git8 kernel and its config file,
and rebuilt it under FC5, with just a few differences for the new USB
2.0 disk I added to a PCI controller I just put in, namely
[root@donkey linux-2.6.16-rc5-git8]# diff .config
/fc3/usr/src/linux-2.6.16-rc5-git8/.config
4c4
< # Fri Apr 7 03:58:23 2006
---
> # Mon Mar 6 22:49:32 2006
1110,1112c1110
< CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD=m
< CONFIG_USB_EHCI_SPLIT_ISO=y
< CONFIG_USB_EHCI_ROOT_HUB_TT=y
---
> # CONFIG_USB_EHCI_HCD is not set
1115c1113
< CONFIG_USB_UHCI_HCD=m
---
> CONFIG_USB_UHCI_HCD=y
1218d1215
< # CONFIG_USB_SISUSBVGA is not set
The result is unexpected - performance delta is still there. Concatenating
output from hdparm -i /dev/hda and hdparm /dev/hda for the same kernel
under FC3 and FC5, the only difference is
[root@donkey ~]# diff /tmp/hdparm.out.2616rc2git8-fc5
/tmp/hdparm.out.2616rc2git8
14c14
< Drive conforms to: (null): ATA/ATAPI-1 ATA/ATAPI-2 ATA/ATAPI-3
ATA/ATAPI-4 ATA/ATAPI-5 ATA/ATAPI-6 ATA/ATAPI-7
---
> Drive conforms to: (null):
27c27
< geometry = 19457/255/63, sectors = 312581808, start = 0
---
> geometry = 19457/255/63, sectors = 160041885696, start = 0
I'll try now and rebuild a 2.6.16-rc5-git8 kernel under FC5 with the
FC3 GCC and see whether that is responsible for the performance
drop... of course if anyone has any idea about what's going on, I
will be happy to try out stuff. Attaching hdparm output from the FC5
2.6.16-rc5-git8 just to show that there is DMA etc. all configured fine.
Thanks in advance, ciao,
--alessandro
"Dreamer ? Each one of us is a dreamer. We just push it down deep because
we are repeatedly told that we are not allowed to dream in real life"
(Reinhold Ziegler)
Attachment:
hdparm.out.2616rc5git8-fc5
Description: Binary data
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 40% IDE performance regression going from FC3 to FC5 with same kernel
- From: Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
- Re: 40% IDE performance regression going from FC3 to FC5 with same kernel
- From: Andreas Mohr <[email protected]>
- Re: 40% IDE performance regression going from FC3 to FC5 with same kernel
- From: "Alessandro Suardi" <[email protected]>
- Re: 40% IDE performance regression going from FC3 to FC5 with same kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig.debug: Set DEBUG_MUTEX to off by default
- Next by Date: Re: patch : hdaps on Thinkpad R52
- Previous by thread: cciss crash while executing hpacucli
- Next by thread: Re: 40% IDE performance regression going from FC3 to FC5 with same kernel
- Index(es):
 |