Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] stacking support for capability module

Quoting T??r??k Edwin ([email protected]):
> Adds stacking support to capability module. Without this patch, I have to boot 
> with capability.disable=1 to get fireflier registered as security module.
> 
> What is current status of stacking support, how should LSM's handle stacking 
> with the capability module?

For now, pretty much like this.

The lsm stacker is still being kept up to date at
www.sf.net/projects/lsm-stacker.

-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC] packet/socket owner match (fireflier) using skfilter
    • From: Török Edwin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] packet/socket owner match (fireflier) using skfilter
    • From: Török Edwin <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][PATCH 0/7] fireflier LSM for labeling sockets based on its creator (owner)
    • From: Török Edwin <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][PATCH 7/7] stacking support for capability module
    • From: Török Edwin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] uts namespaces: Switch to using uts namespaces
• Next by Date: Re: smp race fix between invalidate_inode_pages* and do_no_page
• Previous by thread: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] stacking support for capability module
• Next by thread: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]