Re: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] stacking support for capability module

Quoting T??r??k Edwin ([email protected]):
> Adds stacking support to capability module. Without this patch, I have to boot 
> with capability.disable=1 to get fireflier registered as security module.
> 
> What is current status of stacking support, how should LSM's handle stacking 
> with the capability module?

For now, pretty much like this.

The lsm stacker is still being kept up to date at
www.sf.net/projects/lsm-stacker.

-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RFC] packet/socket owner match (fireflier) using skfilter
  - From: Török Edwin <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] packet/socket owner match (fireflier) using skfilter
  - From: Török Edwin <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH 0/7] fireflier LSM for labeling sockets based on its creator (owner)
  - From: Török Edwin <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH 7/7] stacking support for capability module
  - From: Török Edwin <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] uts namespaces: Switch to using uts namespaces
Next by Date: Re: smp race fix between invalidate_inode_pages* and do_no_page
Previous by thread: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] stacking support for capability module
Next by thread: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]