On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 12:10 +0900, Yasunori Goto wrote: > > This size doesn't mean bytes. It is hash table entry size. > So, wait_table_hash_size() or wait_table_entry_size() might be better. wait_table_hash_nr_entries() is pretty obvious, although a bit long. -- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [Patch:003/004] wait_table and zonelist initializing for memory hotadd (wait_table initialization)
- From: Yasunori Goto <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch:003/004] wait_table and zonelist initializing for memory hotadd (wait_table initialization)
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [Patch:003/004] wait_table and zonelist initializing for memory hotadd (wait_table initialization)
- From: Yasunori Goto <[email protected]>
- [Patch:003/004] wait_table and zonelist initializing for memory hotadd (wait_table initialization)
- Prev by Date: Re: [Patch:003/004] wait_table and zonelist initializing for memory hotadd (wait_table initialization)
- Next by Date: [PATCH] md: Make sure 64bit fields in version-1 metadata are 64-bit aligned.
- Previous by thread: Re: [Patch:003/004] wait_table and zonelist initializing for memory hotadd (wait_table initialization)
- Next by thread: [Patch:002/004] wait_table and zonelist initializing for memory hotadd (add return code for init_current_empty_zone)
- Index(es):
 |