On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:37:42AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
>
> We don't. I think update functions do not need an aligned buffer for
> data which is smaller then the alignment size.
You're right. If we do ever get any hardware that requires this we can
always change it later on.
Another thing, could you pleas change the stack allocation in final so
that it does it like cbc_process_decrypt? The reason is that gcc is too
stupid to not allocate that buffer unconditionally.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
