On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:57:04AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > #include "../pci.h"
> >
> > When one introdues relative apths like the above this is a good sign
> > that the header file ought to move to a common place somewhere in
> > include/.
>
> No, this is a pci-core only header file. I really don't want to have
> these in include/linux/pci.h as no one other than the pci core, or pci
> hotplug drivers need to use it.
But that hold true for other stuff in include/* also.
The guideline is (my understanding):
- Use .h files only when declarations are shared by more than one .c
file
- Put the .h file in same dir as the .c files, iff the .c files are all
in same dir (and include using #include "file.h")
- For bigger subsystems create an include/<subsystem> dir for shared .h
files (and include using #include <file.h>)
- For smaller subsystems create an include/linux/<subsystem> dir for
shared .h files (and include using #include <file.h>)
And then we also have:
- For Greg's pci-core keep the shared .h file with the .c files
(and include using #include "../file.h")
See why this sticks out a bit.
Not that I imply the above guidlines are strictly followed - but thats
the best I have seen.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]