Re: [patch 1/3] mm: An enhancement of OVERCOMMIT_GUESS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 03:20:10 -0400
Hideo AOKI <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Kamezawa-san,
> Thank you for your comments.
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > Hi, AOKI-san
> I like your idea. But, in the function, I think we need to care
> lowmem_reserve too.
Ah, I see.

> Since __vm_enough_memory() doesn't know zone and cpuset information,
> we have to guess proper value of lowmem_reserve in each zone
> like I did in calculate_totalreserve_pages() in my patch.
> Do you think that we can do this calculation every time?
> If it is good enough, I'll make revised patch.
I just thought to show "how to calculate" in unified way is better.
But if things goes ugly, please ignore my comment.

Do you have a detailed comparison of test result with and without this patch ?
I'm interested in.
I'm sorry if I missed your post of result.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux