Hi Kumar, On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 20:23:23 -0500 Kumar Gala <[email protected]> wrote: > > We need the irq rework before I'd be willing to do this. The main > dependancy between asm-ppc and asm-powerpc is the static IRQs we > currently have. I'd rather spend time on fixing up the IRQ handling > to parse the flat dev tree. I agree entirely. To clrify, I was referring to header files that only exist in include/asm-ppc and are trivial to move. Patches following ... -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [email protected] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpuzbYZSo84l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of powerpc
- From: Kumar Gala <[email protected]>
- Re: Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of powerpc
- References:
- Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of powerpc
- From: Kumar Gala <[email protected]>
- Re: Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of powerpc
- From: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
- Re: Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of powerpc
- From: Kumar Gala <[email protected]>
- Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of powerpc
- Prev by Date: RE: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT]
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] kexec: typo in machine_kexec()
- Previous by thread: Re: Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of powerpc
- Next by thread: Re: Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of powerpc
- Index(es):
 |