On Tuesday 04 April 2006 18:12, Rene Herman wrote:
> To Dmitry, I see you saying "probe() failing is driver's problem. The
> device is still there and should still be presented in sysfs.". No, at
> least in the case of these platform drivers (or at least these old ISA
> cards using the platform driver interface), a -ENODEV return from the
> probe() method would mean the device is _not_ present (or not found at
> least). NODEV.
Or you could separate device probing code from driver->probe(). BTW I think
that ->probe() is not the best name for that method. It really is supposed
to allocate resources and initialize the device so that it is ready to be
used, not to verify that device is present. The code that created device
shoudl've done that.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
