Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param

From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:14:27 -0700

> I'm not going to fight too hard for it (I'll let Michael champion it
> if he really cares), but I think this is a legitimate -stable patch:
> it fixes a panic that real users are seeing.

You were using an interface in an unintended way.

Do you know %100 for certain that moving that callback to
a different location won't break anything?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
    • From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
    • From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Please pull from 'for_paulus' branch of powerpc
• Next by Date: RE: [Fastboot] [PATCH] kexec on ia64
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 11/26] IPOB: Move destructor from neigh->ops to neigh_param
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]