Re: blade servers?

Larry McVoy wrote:

> For all of the Unix like platforms, we'd be happy with 2Ghz Athlons (don't
> need opterons) with 256MB.  It's true that for the windows platforms we

No specific recommendations, but one thing to keep in mind is that later
process/stepping Athlon 64/Opterons are far more power efficient (especially
when using powernow) than older 32 bit Athlons.

I'm not sure why Xeon based space heaters^H^H blades have been recommended in
previous posts when low power is an issue?!?

Cheers
David

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

---

• References:
  • blade servers?
    • From: [email protected] (Larry McVoy)

• Prev by Date: [RFC2] non-power of 2 allocator for noMMU Linux
• Next by Date: dma_alloc_coherent
• Previous by thread: Re: blade servers?
• Next by thread: Re: blade servers?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]