On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 01:45:04AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.16-mm2:
>...
> +x86-clean-up-subarch-definitions.patch
>...
> x86 updates.
>...
The following looks bogus:
config KEXEC
bool "kexec system call (EXPERIMENTAL)"
- depends on EXPERIMENTAL
+ depends on EXPERIMENTAL && (!X86_VOYAGER && SMP)
The dependencies do now say that KEXEC is only offered for machines that
are _both_ non-Voyager and SMP.
Is the problem you wanted to express that a non-SMP Voyager config
didn't compile?
AFAIR I recently sent a patch disallowing non-SMP Voyager configurations
that wasn't yet applied.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
