Am Dienstag März 28 2006 23:47 schrieb Nigel Cunningham: > Hi. > > On Wednesday 29 March 2006 03:30, Prakash Punnoor wrote: > > Hi, I am just wondering whether you found out what the issue is with the > > link problem. If you have some patch ready (even if it is hackish) I > > would be happy to use it. > > > > Anyways, I know you are busy with swsusp2. ;-) > > > > Cheers, > > Yes, I do have a patch. It is hackish at the moment because as you've > rightly guessed, I haven't gotten around to finishing it. It also doesn't > work perfectly - I sometimes need to rmmod and insmod after booting a new > kernel to get the link to come up. But, apart from that, it works fine. Thx for sharing it. Unfortunately it doesn't help me. (I am not using suspend or anything on that machine as it is supposed to be running 24/7.) After pulling out the LAN cable and putting it back in. network is dead. The driver (even unpatched) sees the cable is back in, but obviously wrongly reinitializes(?) the nic: Ie, kernel says after pluggin cable back in: uli526x: eth0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full duplex but network is dead. I have to do: ifconfig eth0 down modprobe -r uli526x modprobe uli526x ifconfig eth0 up dhclient And then it works again. -- (°= =°) //\ Prakash Punnoor /\\ V_/ \_V
Attachment:
pgpjtL5RUOiex.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Issues with uli526x networking module
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Issues with uli526x networking module
- Prev by Date: How Long Can The US Market Hold On? ryhfi7
- Next by Date: [PATCH] unusual_devs.h, kernel 2.6.15.6
- Previous by thread: How Long Can The US Market Hold On? ryhfi7
- Next by thread: Re: Issues with uli526x networking module
- Index(es):
 |