On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:27:06AM +0900, Hyok S. Choi wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 April 2006 04:44 am, Russell King wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 08:24:10PM +0900, Hyok S. Choi wrote:
> >
> > > +static void dcc_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
> > > +{
> > > +#ifdef DCC_IRQ_USED /* real IRQ used */
> > > + free_irq(port->irq, port);
> > > +#else
> > > + spin_lock(&port->lock);
> > > + cancel_rearming_delayed_work(&dcc_poll_task);
> >
> > cancel_rearming_delayed_work() might sleep due to it calling
> > flush_workqueue. Therefore, you must not be holding a spinlock.
>
> Thus, I've just revised the code to lock around a counter variable
> operation, which is used for life control of the polling task.
> I've just posted the revised #3. :-)
Why do you think you need such complexity?
cancel_rearming_delayed_work() will wait until the poll task has
completed and has been removed from the system. It's explicitly
designed for work handlers which self-rearm.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]