Re: [PATCH] Remove sys_ prefix of new syscalls from __NR_sys_*

On Mon, Apr 03 2006, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:28:57 +0200
> 
> > On Sun, Apr 02 2006, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> > > On i386, we don't use sys_ prefix for __NR_*. This patch removes it.
> > > [FWIW, _syscall*() macros will generate foo() instead of sys_foo().]
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
> > 
> > Thanks, I'll just shove that into the splice branch.
> 
> Please update the other include/asm-*/unistd.h files which
> use the same sys_* name.

Will do.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Remove sys_ prefix of new syscalls from __NR_sys_*
    • From: OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Remove sys_ prefix of new syscalls from __NR_sys_*
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Remove sys_ prefix of new syscalls from __NR_sys_*
    • From: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: include/asm-arm/memory.h changes break zaurus sl-5500 boot
• Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc1
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Remove sys_ prefix of new syscalls from __NR_sys_*
• Next by thread: "tvec_bases too large for per-cpu data" commit broke early_serial_setup()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]