On Sun, Apr 02, John Mylchreest wrote:
> Going from that, I can push a patch for gcc upstream to remove the
> __KERNEL__ dep, but gcc4.1 ships with ssp by standard, and the semantics
> between the IBM patch for SSP applied to gcc-3 and ggc-4 have changed.
gcc4.1 has no obvious problems with --enable-ssp
> -fno-stack-protector would work for gcc4, but for gcc3 it could still be
> patially enabled, and requires -fno-stack-protector-all. Mind If I ask
> whats incorrect about defining __KERNEL__ for the bootcflags?
arch/powerpc/boot is no kernel code, its supposed to be selfcontained.
Prepare a patch which uses the cc-option macro.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
