Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm2 4/4] sched_domain: Allocate sched_group structures dynamically

On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 11:35:13PM -0800, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> Only thing I see in this is, even if there are very few cpus in the
> exclusive cpuset, we end up allocating NR_CPUS groups and waste memory.

I had realized that, but used NR_CPUS just to keep it simple (as is
being done in the case of NUMA - where they simply allocate for
MAX_NODES). I can take a shot at optimizing the memory allocation size
(for NUMA as well) and send another patch later, if people think so.

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 2.6.16-mm2 4/4] sched_domain: Allocate sched_group structures dynamically
    • From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm2 4/4] sched_domain: Allocate sched_group structures dynamically
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm2 4/4] sched_domain: Allocate sched_group structures dynamically
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: PROBLEM: 2.6.16.1 oops
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sbp2: fix spinlock recursion
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm2 4/4] sched_domain: Allocate sched_group structures dynamically
• Next by thread: Re: [RESEND][2.6.15] New ATA error messages on upgrade to 2.6.15
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]