On Saturday 01 April 2006 8:46 am, Alan Stern wrote:
> I think you have misunderstood my point. Yes, devices are part of the
> platform bus only if they explicitly want to be. My point was that even
> though they _do_ want to be on the platform bus,
I'm not clear on why it would want to be on the platform bus;
what would its inner platform-ness consist of?
There really isn't a "bus" that makes much sense for such a
singleton device to sit on.
> in this situation they
> _can't_ because they are forced to register a struct device, not a struct
> platform_device. The choice is not up to the driver; it is determined by
> the USB Gadget framework.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
