On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 11:35:42AM -0500, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote: ... > I don't see any problem over loopback either. Perhaps I'll try increasing > delays with tc netem. That will have to wait until later. That would be my next try. > In any case, I tried on our NetApp FAS-250, and I see the same problem: > Mount options are: > netapp:/home /nfs/netapp/home nfs rw,v3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,hard,intr,tcp,lock,addr=netapp 0 0 Thanks a lot! Ah, I thought the computers only hated me ;) -- / jakob - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
- From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
- From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
- From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
- From: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
- From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
- From: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
- From: Jakob Oestergaard <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
- From: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." <[email protected]>
- Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16-mm1 leaks in dvb playback (found)
- Next by Date: RE: Synchronizing Bit operations V2
- Previous by thread: Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
- Next by thread: Re: NFS client (10x) performance regression 2.6.14.7 -> 2.6.15
- Index(es):