Andi Kleen <[email protected]> writes:
> On Friday 31 March 2006 18:37, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> Jes Sorensen <[email protected]> writes:
>>
>> > struct poll_list *walk;
>> > struct fdtable *fdt;
>> > int max_fdset;
>> > - /* Allocate small arguments on the stack to save memory and be faster */
>> > - char stack_pps[POLL_STACK_ALLOC];
>> > + /* Allocate small arguments on the stack to save memory and be
>> > + faster - use long to make sure the buffer is aligned properly
>> > + on 64 bit archs to avoid unaligned access */
>> > + long stack_pps[POLL_STACK_ALLOC/sizeof(long)];
>> > struct poll_list *stack_pp = NULL;
>>
>> struct poll_list stack_pps[POLL_STACK_ALLOC / sizeof(struct poll_list)];
>>
>> is more readable, and probably gcc align it rightly?
>
> Yes, but it would be wrong
OK. So how about this?
char stack_pps[POLL_STACK_ALLOC]
__attribute__((aligned (sizeof(struct poll_list))));
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]