On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > We currently have three ways for getting access to device memory --
> > ioremap(), ioremap_nocache() and pci_iomap(). 99% of the callers of
> > ioremap() are doing it to access device registers, and really, really
> > want to use ioremap_nocache() instead. I presume nobody notices on PCs
> > because they have write-through caches, but it ought to trip up people
> > trying to flush writes.
>
> Actually MTRRs take care of that on x86.
> So essentially on x86 ioremap() for devices is already ioremap_uncached()
> And ioremap on memory is cached.
>
> That's nice and simple semantics that other platforms can emulate too.
> Doing things differently will just cause pain for the other platforms
> when they have to fix up drivers all the time.
That doesn't make any sense. What's the point of ioremap_nocache() if
ioremap() does magic things that make things uncached? And who says
you're allowed to ioremap() memory anyway?
> It all works fine until someone wants WC too. I would rather add a
> ioremap_wc(), that would be more useful.
ioremap_wc() sounds like a good idea.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
