On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> You applied the wrong patch. The inlined one was against virgin 2.6.16,
> for folks to comment on, and the attached was the incremental against
> the 2.6.16 anti-starvation tree.
>
> Ah, your mailer probably showed both as attached. Anyway, here's the
> incremental again inlined.
Ah OK, it's not even the mailer, it's me. I read the message and did not
notice the attachment, just the inline patch. Then I forwarded it to my
work address and lost the attachment. You know the rest ...
> (note to self: never include patches for two trees in same message)
Good advice. Or manually edit the directory name in the diff to
explicitly show what it refers to. Eg:
--- linux-2.6.16-sched7/kernel/sched.c 2006-03-27 06:11:01.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.16/kernel/sched.c 2006-03-30 10:50:46.000000000 +0200
Anyway, thanks for your reply, I'll re-apply it and recompile.
> -Mike
Cheers,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
