* Sam Vilain ([email protected]) wrote:
> AIUI inode_ops are not globals, they are per FS.
Heh, yes really bad example.
> That to me reads as:
>
> "To avoid having to consider making security_ops non-global we will
> force security modules to be container aware".
Not my intention. Rather, I think from a security standpoint there's
sanity in controlling things with a single policy. I'm thinking of
containers as a simple and logical extension of roles. Point being,
the per-object security label can easily include notion of container.
> It also means you could not mix security modules that affect the same
> operation different containers on a system. Personally I don't care, I
> don't use them. But perhaps this inflexibility will bring problems later
> for some.
No issue with addressing these issues as they come.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
