Re: [stable] Re: [PATCH] change kbuild to not rely on incorrect GNU make behavior

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 08:32:27AM -0500, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> 
> On the gripping hand, it's quite possible to provide a significantly
> smaller, targeted patch that fixes just the most egregious problem with
> only two lines changed, if the -stable team was interested in that
> instead.

That sounds good, and if it solves problems for people, should be
acceptable.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] change kbuild to not rely on incorrect GNU make behavior
  - From: Paul Smith <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] change kbuild to not rely on incorrect GNU make behavior
  - From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] change kbuild to not rely on incorrect GNU make behavior
  - From: [email protected] (Arthur Othieno)
- Re: [PATCH] change kbuild to not rely on incorrect GNU make behavior
  - From: "Paul D. Smith" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] wistron_btns: Add support for Amilo 7400M
Next by Date: Re: Fix unlock_buffer() to work the same way as bit_unlock()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] change kbuild to not rely on incorrect GNU make behavior
Next by thread: XFS _apparent_ corruption: "DATA POINT" (worked around); 2.6.15.4-biglowmem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]