--- Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
wrote:
> >
> > If so, then why khttpd _was_ included into kernel?
>
> That has been widely acknowledged as a mistake.
> You'll note that khttpd
> was removed prior to the release of linux-2.6.0.
> Nobody misses it.
>
That's bad. I think that some people need this, so my
module will be distributed like Tux webserver,
separately from kernel.
Anyway, can you help me by explaining your opinion
about my code, not about development phylosophy?
That's my first work and it's important to me to find
if I done something unefficient.
Edward Chernenko <[email protected]>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
