On Mar 28, 2006, at 15:04:53, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
On Monday 27 March 2006 21:48, Rob Landley wrote:
Either way, it's not sounding like something I can grab and build
uClibc systems with any time soon, the way I could use Mazur's
headers to build uClibc. I'll probably wind up using the gentoo
headers when the 2.6.14 version ships.
That's the trouble. While I have nothing against someone (as in --
not me :) doing all that abi separation, it's not something I can
use straight away. Hell, I don't even get where in all of it I'd
end up with something I could use (granted, I haven't looked into
the thread too closely). Not to mention, that I suspect, that if
there were enough people to do it, it would have gotten done two
years ago.
So unless anybody's got a better idea, I'll try releasing some
initial version of that llh-ng thingie rather soonish and see how
that'll work out. Anybody with me on that? :)
I agree with this approach. I don't think the llh-ng method will be
maintainable in the long-term, which is why I'm doing the KABI
patches, but I think that in the short term that's the fastest way to
get a working set of headers against which to build glibc.
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
