On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 01:10:54PM +0000, Hubert Tonneau wrote:
> Harald Welte wrote:
> >
> > this sounds like you're missing support for the tcp/udp match.
> > This functionality is implemented in xt_tcpudp.{c,ko}, which is compiled
> > as soon as x_tables is compiled.
>
> Loading 'xt_tcpudp' module solves the problem. Thanks for the answer.
great.
> So, the problem was just that the new 'x_tables' module is loaded automatically
> according to modules dependencies, but 'xt_tcpudp' is not.
that is strange, since the iptables userspace program should explicitly
request loading that module.
unfortunately you didn't reply to my question on the version number of
the iptables program. Maybe we have some yet-unknown issues with old
iptables versions, and I want to get to the bottom of this.
--
- Harald Welte <[email protected]> http://netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
Attachment:
pgpbJag0yOgtV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: failed to configure iptables with 2.6.16 kernel
- From: Hubert Tonneau <[email protected]>
- Re: failed to configure iptables with 2.6.16 kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: regular swsusp flamewar [was Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code]
- Next by Date: Re: regular swsusp flamewar [was Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code]
- Previous by thread: Re: failed to configure iptables with 2.6.16 kernel
- Next by thread: 2.6.16-git4: kernel BUG at block/ll_rw_blk.c:3497
- Index(es):
 |