Pavel Machek <[email protected]> writes:
>> You know that I disagree that doing suspend in userspace is the
>> right
>
> You know "disagreeing" with subsystem maintainer (and everyone else
> for that matter) is not exactly helpful in getting patches merged. You
> are free to believe whatever you want, but if you disagree on
> something as fundamental as "do not put unneccessary code to kernel"
> with me, it should be no surprise that I "disagree" with your patches
> (*).
>
>> approach, and you know that current uswsusp can't do everything Suspend2 does
>> without further substantial modification. Please stop painting me as the bad
>> guy because I won't roll over and play dead for you. Please also
>> stop
>
> I'm not trying to paint you as a bad guy. But Mark said you are trying
> to help, and in that context I'd read it as "trying to help mainline
> development". And you are not doing that, you are developing your own
> suspend2 branch, that has nothing to do with mainline. I think we can
> agree on that one...
The main point for me is that suspend2 works, while mainline supspend
does not ("works": it takes less time to suspend/resume than to
shutdown/reboot).
I haven't tried uswsusp yet. Why try another out-of-kernel suspend when
suspend2 works perfectly?
--
Hilsen Harald.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
