On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 17:05 -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> I have been reviewing this thread and had one point
> to add here.
>
> The identity of the initiator port is important, at
> least to a SCSI target that can implement (PERSISTENT)
> RESERVE on behalf of one of its logical units.
> So you may need to keep the equivalent of Scsi_Host:this_id
> somewhere.
Since Scsi_Host:this_id is an integer, it's impossible that a
TransportID (which is what you use to identify the port) would ever fit
into it, since these are defined to be at least 24 bytes long.
> That is another shortcoming of the <hctl> tuple: the
> initiator port isn't there.
Actually, it may not be in HCIL, but it is in the transport classes
(although the only implementor is FC at this time, I think). And that's
where it should be since format and contents of the transport ID are
transport specific.
James
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
