Re: scheduler starvation resistance patches for 2.6.16

Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Knowing that not everybody runs the latest/greatest mm kernels, I've
> adapted my scheduler starvation resistance tree to virgin 2.6.16.

Thanks! 

> Test feedback much appreciated.

It's not bad.  w/ credit_c1/2 set to 0 results in an improvement in running 
the MESA demos  "# gears & reflect & morph3d" .

But a simple "# while :; do :; done &" (10x) makes a "# ping 10.1 -A -s8" 
choke.

Can you post a modified patch that will apply to 2.6.16-rt10 as well?

Thanks!

--
Al

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: scheduler starvation resistance patches for 2.6.16
    • From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Readahead value 128K? (was Re: Drastic Slowdown of 'fseek()'
• Next by Date: Re: ALPS stop worked between 2.6.13 and 2.6.16
• Previous by thread: Re: scheduler starvation resistance patches for 2.6.16
• Next by thread: Re: scheduler starvation resistance patches for 2.6.16
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]