On 3/26/06, Con Kolivas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sunday 26 March 2006 17:42, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 19:08 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > I guess me criticising your patches made you want to find flaws with my
> > > code.
> >
> > I was simply curious as to how well the damn thing performs Con. Don't
> > worry though, I'll never make the mistake of testing and reporting ever
> > again.
>
> That was a foolishly bitter comment from me that you did absolutely nothing to
> deserve and I humbly apologise.
@Mike: Do we have a testcase for the sleep problem?
@Con: Is it possible to patch staircase to address this issue as Mike
did with the stock kernel, so I can see the testcase suceeding?
Perhaps changing a little the interactivity detection algorithm
(disabling fairness a little)?
I would like to test any patches to improve this situation on staircase too.
I would like to see more cooperation on both of you, as you are trying
to solve the same problems as I can see.
Please keep walking in the same direction and try to help each other. :)
Thank you both for your effort, it is very apreciated,
--
[]s,
André Goddard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
