Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c: less PROC_FS=n #ifdef's

On Ne 26-03-06 14:25:04, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I'm surprised that kill-ifdefs-in-mtdcorec.patch in -mm that removes
> #ifdef's for the PROC_FS=n case wasn't tested with PROC_FS=n...

Sorry for that, I somehow assumed it was trivial and did not test it
properly.
								Pavel

-- 
Picture of sleeping (Linux) penguin wanted...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [2.6 patch] drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c: less PROC_FS=n #ifdef's
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [GIT] overall system responsiveness / ALSA partly broken
Next by Date: Re: unlock_buffer() and clear_bit()
Previous by thread: [2.6 patch] drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c: less PROC_FS=n #ifdef's
Next by thread: [2.6 patch] CONFIGFS_FS must depend on SYSFS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]