Re: [RFC PATCH 07/35] Make LOAD_OFFSET defined by subarch

  Hi,

> Rather than changing LOAD_OFFSET in Linux, why not leave this alone and
> change the Xen domain builder to properly interpret the ELF program
> header fields?

I've a patch in the queue which does exactly that ;)
Planned to submit just after xen 3.0.2 release ...

cheers,

  Gerd

-- 
Gerd 'just married' Hoffmann <[email protected]>
I'm the hacker formerly known as Gerd Knorr.
http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/just-married.jpeg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • [RFC PATCH 07/35] Make LOAD_OFFSET defined by subarch
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC PATCH 07/35] Make LOAD_OFFSET defined by subarch
    • From: Dan Hecht <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH -rt, RFC] rid rcu_read_lock() and _unlock() of common-case memory barriers
• Next by Date: [GIT] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/35] Make LOAD_OFFSET defined by subarch
• Next by thread: [RFC PATCH 08/35] Add Xen-specific memory management definitions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]