RE: [PATCH] less tlb flush in unmap_vmas

On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 23:44 -0800, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> 
> OK, I think it would be beneficial to take a latency measurement
> again,
> just to see how it perform now a day.  The dynamics might changed. 

I will test this with Ingo's latency tracer as soon as I get a chance.
I had previously posted results showing this to be a problem spot.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • RE: [PATCH] less tlb flush in unmap_vmas
    • From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16: Oops - null ptr in blk_recount_segments?
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.16: Oops - null ptr in blk_recount_segments?
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] less tlb flush in unmap_vmas
• Next by thread: BIOS causes (exposes?) modprobe (load_module) kernel oops
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]