Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] KABI example conversion and cleanup

On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 07:40:14PM -0500, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> According to Jeff Dike, UML would like access to some of that stuff  
> unrestricted by __KERNEL__ too.  

Not quite true - I just want them physically separated from the
non-userspace-usable stuff, as in different files.  I don't care
whether they are inside #ifdef __KERNEL__, because that's defined in
the UML build.

				Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [ANNOUNCE] linux-libc-headers dead
    • From: Mariusz Mazur <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][PATCH 0/2] KABI example conversion and cleanup
    • From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] KABI example conversion and cleanup
    • From: Eric Piel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] KABI example conversion and cleanup
    • From: Rob Landley <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] KABI example conversion and cleanup
    • From: Eric Piel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] KABI example conversion and cleanup
    • From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: eCryptfs Design Document
• Next by Date: Re: Block I/O Schedulers: Can they be made selectable/device? @runtime?
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] KABI example conversion and cleanup
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] KABI example conversion and cleanup
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]