[email protected] wrote:
Hi,
More information. I ran the test with "-onoreservation" thinking that
the patch didn't address "reservation code" issues and I still ran
into block allocation problems. Hope this helps.
As you said, the previous patches were broken because of my mailer,
and part of them would be rejected.
I'm re-sending them; I have not changed them other than the mailer.
Could you try new patches and check what happened?
I have run fsx with these patches several times and the problems
weren't reproduced.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Sato [email protected]
---
Sure. I will give it a spin.
BTW, did you really test them with > 8TB filesystem ?
I ran bunch of "dd"s to create few files and then ran mutiple copies of
"fsx" tests.
Then I run into problems in few seconds of the tests.
Thanks,
Badari
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
