Re: [PATCH] cleanup for net/tipc/name_distr.c::tipc_named_node_up()

["Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>]

On 3/22/06, Per Liden <per.liden@ericsson.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Mar 2006, Jesper Juhl wrote:
>
> > Small cleanup patch for net/tipc/name_distr.c::tipc_named_node_up()
>
> Not sure if you followed the discussion on the tipc mailinglist, so here's
> a short summary.
>
I don't read the tipc mailing list, no.


> > Patch does the following:
> >
> >  - Change a few pointer assignments from 0 to NULL (makes sparse happy).
>
> Ok.
>
> >  - Move a few variable assignment outside the tipc_nametbl_lock lock.
>
> Ok.
>

Do you want a new patch with just these bits in it or will you take
care of it yourself?


> >  - Make sure to free the allocated buffer before returning so we don't leak.
>
> The additional kfree_skb() looks incorrect. If a buffer if allocated it
> will later be released by tipc_link_send().
>
I see. Then that bit is indeed incorrect.

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/