>>>> + swapfunc(a, b, es, swaptype) \ >>>> +} while(0) >>> ^^ >>>Missing semicolon. >> >> It was missing before too. ;) > >No, previously it was provided at the call site. Bad habit IMO. It does not hurt to provide it in both the macro and the call site, GCC can handle empty instructions. Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs
- From: Andreas Schwab <[email protected]>
- Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs
- From: Måns Rullgård <[email protected]>
- Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs
- References:
- Parenthesize macros in xfs
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs
- From: Nathan Scott <[email protected]>
- Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs
- From: Nathan Scott <[email protected]>
- Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs
- From: Andreas Schwab <[email protected]>
- Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs
- From: Andreas Schwab <[email protected]>
- Parenthesize macros in xfs
- Prev by Date: Re: Save 320K on production machines?
- Next by Date: Re: Virtual Serial Port
- Previous by thread: Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs
- Next by thread: Re: Parenthesize macros in xfs
- Index(es):
 |