On Saturday 25 March 2006 05:01, Con Kolivas wrote yet: > > I don't expect that staircase will be better in every single situation. > However it will be better more often, especially when it counts (like audio > or video skipping) and far more predictable. All that in 300 lines less > code :) > I thinks the main difference is those other scheduler improvements. Some of them are compatible with staircase. Could you also try a mixed and matched 2.6.16-ck1+mm? -- GPG Key id: 0xD1F10BA2 Fingerprint: 96E2 304A B9C4 949A 10A0 9105 9543 0453 D1F1 0BA2 AstralStorm
Attachment:
pgp86cUXPEf2s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
- References:
- [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
- From: "André Goddard Rosa" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
- From: Con Kolivas <[email protected]>
- [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.16 hugetlbfs problem - DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
- Next by Date: [PATCH 2.6.16-mm1 1/2] sched_domain: handle kmalloc failure
- Previous by thread: Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
- Next by thread: Re: [ck] [benchmark] Interbench 2.6.16-ck/mm
- Index(es):