Hi,
I noticed you recently changed the way you handle SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED macro.
Former version was something like that:
#define SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) \
(spinlock_t) { { __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) } }
while current version is:
# define SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED \
(spinlock_t) { { __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED } }
I noticed your 2.6.16-rt6 patch includes two calls to
SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname) macro, the first one in
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c and the last one in
include/asm-powerpc/rwsem.h.
Is this the right behaviour?
Regards,
--
Luca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]