Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/7] Some basic vserver infrastructure

I made a preliminary attempt to rebase the /proc hooks atop of your
work. I looked forward to being ready for if a patchset like this got
adopted to -mm to be able to hand that piece over :-).

I strongly object against using /proc hooks to get virtualization-like
solution.
You endup with lots of hooks and unmaintainable code.
Also though it works find with a small subset of /proc and sysctl, it
works poorly with dynamic trees, as the same entries can be
created in container, though they already exist in host. e.g. network
device names.

Thanks,
Kirill


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/7] Some basic vserver infrastructure
    • From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/7] Some basic vserver infrastructure
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/7] Some basic vserver infrastructure
    • From: Sam Vilain <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/7] Some basic vserver infrastructure
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] Ignore MCFG if the mmconfig area isn't reserved in thee820 table
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/7] Some basic vserver infrastructure
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/7] Some basic vserver infrastructure
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]