On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 11:08 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:23:45PM -0800, Andrew Morton ([email protected]) wrote:
> > "David S. Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
> > > Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:59:01 +0100
> > >
> > > > then make the syslog part optional.. if it's not already!
> > >
> > > Regardless I still think the filesystem events connector is a useful
> > > facility.
> >
> > Why's that?
> >
> > (I'd viewed it as a fun thing, but I haven't really seen much pull for it,
> > and the scalability issues in there aren't trivial).
>
> This module uses ratelimiting of event generation, so it will not hurt
> performance, but probably this should be somehow tuned from userspace.
.. so it has become unreliable for any kind of real use that depends on
getting complete events. Such as virus scanning or updatedb etc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
