Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/10] 64 bit resources core changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> hmmmm are there any platforms where unsigned long long is > 64 bits?
> (and yes it would be nice if there was a u64 printf flag ;)

Adding a new printf flag is technically _trivial_.

The problem is getting gcc not to warn about it every time it sees it 
(while not losing the gcc format string checking entirely). Do newer gcc's 
allow some way of saying "this flag takes this type" for extended format 
definitions?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux