Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/10] 64 bit resources core changes

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> hmmmm are there any platforms where unsigned long long is > 64 bits?
> (and yes it would be nice if there was a u64 printf flag ;)

Adding a new printf flag is technically _trivial_.

The problem is getting gcc not to warn about it every time it sees it 
(while not losing the gcc format string checking entirely). Do newer gcc's 
allow some way of saying "this flag takes this type" for extended format 
definitions?

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/10] 64 bit resources core changes
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/10] 64 bit resources core changes
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH 0/10] 64 bit resources
    • From: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][PATCH 1/10] 64 bit resources core changes
    • From: Vivek Goyal <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/10] 64 bit resources core changes
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/34] mm: Page Replacement Policy Framework
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/10] 64 bit resources core changes
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/10] 64 bit resources core changes
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/10] 64 bit resources core changes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]